Skip to main content

"Judge Not" & Caring for Casualties

In the early part of the Vietnam War, I visited an officer at Walter Reed Army Hospital. He had been badly burned when his jeep hit a land mine. The Vietnamese soldier who was with him was also critically injured. These two men were fellow soldiers.

When they became casualties, however, the great difference between them became evident. The American went to a U.S. hospital and on to full recovery. The Vietnamese went to a Vietnamese hospital, where he was almost certain to die. My friend told me how thankful he was to be in the U.S. Army instead of the Vietnamese Army. He had been a casualty in the Korean Conflict also, so he knew what he was talking about.

The difference lay in the quality of care given to casualties. In other wars, in other armies, at other times, there was an even greater difference than in the quality of care. There was no care at all! Casualties were left to die. Their deaths had a significant impact on the men who remained uninjured. They were not willing to risk themselves in combat when they knew nobody cared enough to rescue them if they were injured.

We had to relearn that lesson the hard way with Navy pilots in the Southwest Pacific in early 1942. When a pilot had to ditch because his plane was shot up or had run out of fuel, the decision was made not to risk the lives of more pilots and other planes and ships for one man.

That decision was based on economy, not morale. The morale of the pilots went down so far that the decision was quickly reversed. The next pilot in the water was rescued at the expense of several other planes.

We have not had that problem since in the U.S. Armed Forces. Rescue and care of casualties is given high priority. I personally observed this when we kept minesweepers and a rescue destroyer in Wonsan Harbor for three years, in spite of the fact that all the land around the harbor was held by North Korea. We were stationed there to pick up pilots who ditched in the calm water of the harbor. I was on a destroyers and spent several weeks during each of 1951, 1952, and 1953 picking up those pilots.

Admiral Mitscher’s decision to guide his Air Groups home after the First Battle of the Philippine Sea by turning on all the searchlights on all the ships of Task Force 58 was one of the great moral and morale decisions of the Second World War. He risked the lives of thousands to save the lives of a few.

We Christians are engaged in a spiritual war that is far greater than World War II. It includes all people and nations everywhere. We have learned much about the conduct of war on the spiritual plane. We have learned about evangelism; we have learned about training and what is called “discipling,” but we haven’t learned about caring for our casualties. We haven’t learned about caring because we don’t care.

Caring for casualties is not high on our priority list. We have been taught to spend our time with the faithful few, not with the unfaithful ones, who are the casualties. The faithful few are a delight to be with, so the espirit de corps seems high.

There are many casualties; we cannot hide from them. I cannot exist comfortably in an army where the overwhelming majority of soldiers are casualties who are not being cared for. I cannot maintain high morale in such an army. It would be false—fake. To purport to have high morale under such conditions is blinding yourself to reality.

We Christians are not just an army; we are a body. "So that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it" (1 Cor. 12:25-26).

The healthy parts suffer too, if they are part of the body. If they are not suffering and caring, it is because they are not part of the body or because they also are not healthy. They think they are healthy, when in reality they also are sick.

The current status of our spiritual army looks bad to me, with many casualties and most of the rest not caring.
Brothers, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore him gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. (Gal. 6:1-2)
There are at least two reasons for not caring. First is the cost. If we commit ourselves to caring for an invalid, then our time is committed. We cannot forsake the ill person. We anticipate that likewise, if we lovingly begin to care for a spiritual casualty, then we will be forever attached to that invalid. If there is more than one invalid, we can anticipate all of our time disappearing. We are not willing for that to happen.

One of the fallacies in this thinking is that these people will keep on being invalids. They won't. Loving, gentle care restores them, and quite rapidly. They cease to be casualties.

The second reason is our hesitancy to use spiritual judgment. The enemy has infiltrated the camp of the believers through a misapplication of Matthew 7:1-2: “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you.”

Christians regularly say to each other, “Judge not!” This peer pressure (which itself uses the Word of God in a judgmental fashion) paralyzes and intimidates the caring believers so that they don't care for the casualties. They are led to pretend that these casualties are not really injured at all. The results are obvious.

Matthew 7:3-5 completes the context of the “do not judge” teaching: “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye.” This commands us to get rid or sin in our lives so that we may remove the speck from our brother’s eye. That is loving, gentle care for a casualty. The purpose of “judge not” is to keep unqualified people from caring for casualties. People who would make the situation worse are not to participate in the care.

Paul says, “You who are spiritual…” (Gal. 6:1), you who have removed the plank, you who see clearly—you are able to judge. When Jesus said, “If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her” (John 8:7), He was keeping unqualified men from taking care of casualties. He then took care of her. “Go now and leave your life of sin” (John 8:11).

When we quote these verses to each other, we in effect stop even an attempt to care for the one who is hurting. Why? Because we all have planks in our eyes; we have all sinned. We are not fit either for delicate eye surgery or for capital punishment.

But we are Christians. God has made it possible for us not to be hypocrites. He has made it possible for us to get rid of our planks, to get rid of our past sin. In other words, He expects us to get qualified, to be spiritual. “I say this to shame you. Is it possible that there is nobody among you wise enough to judge a dispute between believers?” (1 Cor. 6:5).

God has placed a requirement to care is place on us. We can come up with the excuses of the religious men in the story of the Good Samaritan. That man was a casualty, and he could not help himself. The same situation exists today, and Jesus, commending the Samaritan, said, “Go and do likewise” (Luke 10:37).

In almost every church and Christian group, there are men and women who have become casualties. In many cases, a Bible study or an annual conference is the means of restoring those believers to full health, to a high stage of “combat readiness.” But there are situations where it cannot wait for the conference. “You who are spiritual should restore him gently.” If you are not qualified, then call on someone who is. But do not do nothing!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Is Obedience So Hard?

There are several reasons why obedience seems hard. I will comment on some of them and then speak positively on how obedience is easy. We think: 1) Obedience is an infringement on freedom. Since we are free in Christ, and obedience is somehow contrary to that freedom, we conclude that obedience is not good. Yet we know it is good. Thus, we become confused about obedience and are not single-minded. 2) Obedience is works. We who have been justified by grace through faith are opposed to works; therefore, we are opposed to obedience. 3) We have tried to obey and have failed—frequently. Therefore, the only solution is to disobey and later confess to receive forgiveness. It is easier to be forgiven by grace than to obey by effort. 4) We confuse obedience to men with obedience to God. Although these are sometimes one and the same (see Romans 13, 1 Peter 2-3, Ephesians 5-6, Colossians 3, and Titus 2), sometimes they are not the same (see Colossians 2:20-23, Mark 7, 1 Timothy 4:1-5, a

Lifted Up

In the first thirteen verses of John 3, Nicodemus did not understand what Jesus was talking about. It was nonsense to him. When Jesus said verse fourteen to him, Nicodemus finally understood Jesus. Here it is: “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up…” (John 3:14). The reason it made sense to Nicodemus was because he knew of the event that Jesus spoke of. People who had been bitten by a serpent could look at the bronze snake and did not die. Nicodemus knew the Bible story.   Here it is: “Then the LORD sent venomous snakes among them; they bit the people and many Israelites died. The people came to Moses and said, ‘We sinned when we spoke against the LORD and against you. Pray that the LORD will take the snakes away from us.’ So Moses prayed for the people. The LORD said to Moses, ‘Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.’ So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyo

Getting Old

This is a post for those who are getting old or considering themselves old, from 65-100. Right now, I am 91.* I will be 92 in October. I have my own house, but I cannot live in it alone because of my physical inability to move around. One of my sons lives with me. All of us will have to make some adjustments. That includes money, relatives, your own ability and willpower to stay independent, etc. My advice is if physically and financially you can live independently, you should certainly do that. If you do, you will still need to have visits from your family frequently. You need your family. Even if you don’t need them to take care of you, you need them for the fellowship. The more fellowship you have, the longer you’ll live. If you can stay independent do it, but only if friends and relatives can see you often. In my case, I can’t walk, and I can’t do much physically. So, whether I like it or not, someone else has to get me up, get me showered, and get me dressed. I am blessed to have