Skip to main content

Eye for Eye, Tooth for Tooth: Violence, Justice & Vengeance in the Bible


You have heard that it was said, “Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.” But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well. If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles. Give to the one who asks you, and do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you. (Matthew 5:38-42)

Justice or Vengeance?

Jesus quoted “Eye for eye and tooth for tooth” as “it was said.” It was said as a justification for vengeance and retaliation. Jesus countermanded this saying. But wasn’t it a quotation from the Old Testament? Yes it was, but it is not to the Old Testament passage that Jesus was referring. If it were, He would not have said, “You have heard that it was said.” He would have said, “It is written,” and He would not have disagreed with the Scripture. Jesus was disavowing the misquotation of this Scripture by people who wished to excuse vengeance. Here is the full paragraph from Exodus 21:

"If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise" (Exodus 21:22-25).

This law covers two kinds of premature birth when a pregnant woman is injured during a fight between men. The first kind is where the baby (or the woman) is not seriously injured. In that case, the man who caused the injury is fined by two standards: 1) what the husband demands, and 2) what the court allows. It is a civil suit. The court might or might not allow what the husband demands. It is a court decision, not personal vengeance.

This second kind is where serious injury is inflicted on the baby or the woman. This is a criminal offense. The court is to assign specific penalties to the guilty party. What are they? “You are to take life for life, eye or eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot or foot, burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise.” This was instituted by God through Moses at the same time that He gave the Ten Commandments. This is just law. It does not require a “life or a hand” or a “life for a bruise.” It requires “life for a life” and a “bruise for a bruise.” It does not punish too harshly, nor does it allow for the person who inflicted the injury to go unpunished. It is neither severe nor lenient; it is just.

Jesus was not speaking to this law in Matthew 5. He was speaking to the out-of-context quotation of the law. Three other Scriptures verify that the Bible does not allow vengeance:

• God provided six cities of refuge for the Israelites to protect people from avengers.
• "Do not repay anyone evil for evil" (Romans 12:17).
• "Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written, 'It is mine to avenge; I will repay' says the Lord" (Romans 12:19).

The teaching from the Sermon on the Mount is not a change of God’s mind. The Old Testament passage was a teaching on justice. Here Jesus taught on personal responses to evil directed at you. Your personal response is different from justice.

What Is the Teaching?

The teaching is self-evident, if we do not enter the text with questions like, “Where do we draw the line?” Since that question is not answered in the text, assume there is no line. Jesus did not qualify His teaching.

Let’s break the text down. The basic sentence is, “Do not resist an evil person” (v. 39). The examples which follow assume the other person is evil. He intends harm, theft, or mischief, with evil motives—gain to him and harm or loss to you.

“If someone strikes you on the right cheek turn to him the other also” (v. 39). My father taught me to fight back, and yet he tried to keep me out of fights. In the eighth and ninth grades, I was in five serious fistfights, and another one in the eleventh grade. I did not know Jesus’ teaching, but if I had I would not have taken it seriously. My view of honor, pride, courage, and masculinity, and the peer pressure I was under all forbade turning the other cheek. However, Jesus was speaking about an actual evil person really hitting you on the right cheek and you really turning the left cheek to him so he could hit that one, too.

“If someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well” (v. 40). An evil person wants to sue you. You are to voluntarily settle out of court, give him your shirt, and throw in your coat. This is not “one of your shirts” and “one of your coats.” It is your shirt (singular) and your coat (singular). It is probably all the clothing you have.

“If someone forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles” (v. 41). This force is at sword, spear, or gunpoint. The man is evil. The second mile is a free gift to him. The first cheek, the first article of clothing, and the first mile are all taken by force. The second cheek, the second piece of clothing, and the second mile are gifts to the evil person.

“Give to the one who asks you” (v. 42).

“Do not turn away from the one who wants to borrow from you” (v. 42).

Over the years I have listened to many “what ifs” regarding these last two. Most of them are based upon the notion that the other person might not return the money. Of course he won’t! That is a given. The person is evil. People who want to draw a line on this teaching draw it where nothing gets obeyed.

Why the Teaching?

Why does Jesus teach this? The passage gives no hint as to why. If you want a reason before you will be willing to obey, 1 Corinthians gives a clue: "Though I am free and belong to no man, I make myself a slave to everyone, to win as many as possible" (1 Corinthians 9:19).

There is no force involved here. Paul is absolutely free. So what does he do? He uses his freedom to lose his freedom. He puts himself under voluntary servitude. Why? To win as many as possible. It was Paul’s method of evangelism. I believe Paul (and Peter) learned this from Jesus:

"To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, leaving you an example, that you should follow in his steps. 'He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.' When they hurled their insults at him, he did not retaliate; when he suffered, he made no threats. Instead, he entrusted himself to him who judges justly. He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed" (1 Peter 2:21-24).

This comes immediately after Peter’s teaching on how Christian slaves should behave and immediately before his teaching to wives on how to win their husbands. The Cross is the way of salvation. Jesus’ death on the cross was forced by others, but was also voluntary. We should not proclaim the cross in a different manner than the one Jesus had when He went to the cross. “To this you were called, because Christ suffered for you, that you should follow in his steps” (1 Peter 2:21).

Paul was imitating Jesus. In 1 Corinthians 10:32-11:1 he says to us, "Do not cause anyone to stumble, whether Jews, Greeks or the church of God— even as I try to please everybody in every way. For I am not seeking my own good but the good of many, so that they may be saved. Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ."

One reason for Jesus’ teaching to not resist an evil person is to win him to Christ. Kindness leads people to repentance (Romans 2:4).

Our experience may not make us sure that this works, because not many Christians obey this command. However, we have many examples of people not obeying it, and we know experientially that resisting evil people does not win them for Christ. We should base our decision to obey on Jesus’ command and on His example and Paul’s example.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Is Obedience So Hard?

There are several reasons why obedience seems hard. I will comment on some of them and then speak positively on how obedience is easy. We think: 1) Obedience is an infringement on freedom. Since we are free in Christ, and obedience is somehow contrary to that freedom, we conclude that obedience is not good. Yet we know it is good. Thus, we become confused about obedience and are not single-minded. 2) Obedience is works. We who have been justified by grace through faith are opposed to works; therefore, we are opposed to obedience. 3) We have tried to obey and have failed—frequently. Therefore, the only solution is to disobey and later confess to receive forgiveness. It is easier to be forgiven by grace than to obey by effort. 4) We confuse obedience to men with obedience to God. Although these are sometimes one and the same (see Romans 13, 1 Peter 2-3, Ephesians 5-6, Colossians 3, and Titus 2), sometimes they are not the same (see Colossians 2:20-23, Mark 7, 1 Timothy 4:1-5, a

Lifted Up

In the first thirteen verses of John 3, Nicodemus did not understand what Jesus was talking about. It was nonsense to him. When Jesus said verse fourteen to him, Nicodemus finally understood Jesus. Here it is: “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the wilderness, so the Son of Man must be lifted up…” (John 3:14). The reason it made sense to Nicodemus was because he knew of the event that Jesus spoke of. People who had been bitten by a serpent could look at the bronze snake and did not die. Nicodemus knew the Bible story.   Here it is: “Then the LORD sent venomous snakes among them; they bit the people and many Israelites died. The people came to Moses and said, ‘We sinned when we spoke against the LORD and against you. Pray that the LORD will take the snakes away from us.’ So Moses prayed for the people. The LORD said to Moses, ‘Make a snake and put it up on a pole; anyone who is bitten can look at it and live.’ So Moses made a bronze snake and put it up on a pole. Then when anyo

Getting Old

This is a post for those who are getting old or considering themselves old, from 65-100. Right now, I am 91.* I will be 92 in October. I have my own house, but I cannot live in it alone because of my physical inability to move around. One of my sons lives with me. All of us will have to make some adjustments. That includes money, relatives, your own ability and willpower to stay independent, etc. My advice is if physically and financially you can live independently, you should certainly do that. If you do, you will still need to have visits from your family frequently. You need your family. Even if you don’t need them to take care of you, you need them for the fellowship. The more fellowship you have, the longer you’ll live. If you can stay independent do it, but only if friends and relatives can see you often. In my case, I can’t walk, and I can’t do much physically. So, whether I like it or not, someone else has to get me up, get me showered, and get me dressed. I am blessed to have